header-logo header-logo

16 July 2015 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Opinion , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A call for (more) reform

nlj_7661_bevan

Nicholas Bevan welcomes attempts to assuage the victims of uninsured drivers, but says there is more to be done

After years of campaigning, the minister for transport has finally stripped the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) of the power to impose numerous unjust and arbitrary strike-out provisions that pepper the compensatory scheme for victims of uninsured drivers which it manages on the government’s behalf, These enable the MIB to avoid compensating accident victims. See my article “Why the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 1999 needs to be scrapped” which was published in the Journal of Personal Injury Law in 2012, and my four-part series of articles,“On the right road?”, published in NLJ in 2013, in which I called for extensive and wide ranging reform of the UK’s statutory and extra-statutory provision for implementing the European Directives on motor insurance that require member states to guarantee that motor accident victims recover their full legal entitlement (see 163 NLJ 7546, p 94; 163 NLJ 7547, p 130; 163 NLJ 7548, p 160; 163

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll