header-logo header-logo

Call to regulate third party funding

25 September 2015
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A campaign group, Justice not Profit, has called for statutory regulation of third party litigation funding in England and Wales.

It said third party litigation funders are now funding celebrity divorces and high-value personal injury claims, broadening their investments and offering “new products such as global judgment enforcement”.

It published the results of a survey, conducted by BritainThinks, of 1,261 people this summer which found more than half feel the civil justice system is becoming increasingly Americanised. One respondent commented that “people are being encouraged to extract money from companies and other people…this all came from the USA”. More than 60% had negative views of third party litigation funders, and disliked the rise in advertising for compensation.

Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll