header-logo header-logo

25 January 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Calling talented students

Women in the Law UK is running an essay competition for law students and aspiring lawyers.

The topic is ‘What remaining barriers exist for women, and BAME women, in the legal profession and what steps can be taken to see more senior women leaders in the legal profession, in firms and in courts?’

Women in the Law UK is particularly keen to attract entries from BAME students, and those from socio-economic backgrounds that are not traditionally well represented in the law.

The winner will receive a cash prize, a place at the 2019 Women in the Law UK Annual Dinner in Manchester and the opportunity to be mentored by a senior figure in the legal profession.

A second, highly commended, essay will also be published on the Women in the Law UK website, with the author’s details to be publicised as part of the competition’s PR activity. They will also receive a free place at the Annual Dinner.

Entries are open to UK students seeking to enter the legal profession, including undergraduates (who do not have to be studying law) and LPC students. Essays should be no more than 2,000 words long and must not have appeared or been submitted elsewhere.

The deadline is 14 February, 2019. Send entries to womeninthelawuk@gmail.com, attaching your essay and including your full name and details of your college, university or other educational institution.

Barrister Sally Penni, who founded Women in the Law UK, said: ‘At our events we hear from established voices who have ‘made it’ about their routes to success in the profession and the barriers they have overcome.

‘It is always fascinating, though, to hear from younger members of the audience about the remaining—and emerging—challenges they perceive as they take the first steps in their careers. We launched this competition to provide a platform for their insights and ideas, to help them shape the profession in which I hope they will feel able to remain and thrive for decades.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll