header-logo header-logo

18 September 2019
Issue: 7856 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Cancellations & delays mar progress of court modernisation programme

The courts modernisation programme must not go the way of HS2, the chair of the Bar Council has warned, after progress was revealed to be behind schedule.

A report last week by the National Audit Office (NAO), ‘Transforming courts and tribunals: a progress update’, found HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) was facing a ‘significant challenge’ to deliver the programme on time and on budget.

HMCTS has set up its first two courts and tribunals service centres as well as some new services including online divorce, civil money claims and probate services with simplified forms and faster processing.

However, it has also cancelled two projects and extended the timetable for the reform programme by one year until December 2023, meaning it will now take seven years. HMCTS had previously extended the timetable from four to six years.

So far, HMCTS has closed 127 courts and tribunals in England and Wales. Future closures have been delayed until capacity is freed up, and it has reduced the number of closures from 96 to 77 following a value for money assessment.

Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said: ‘HMCTS must maintain a strong grip if it is to deliver a system that works better for everyone and delivers savings for the taxpayer.’

Richard Atkins QC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘This modernisation programme must not become the HS2 of the justice system.

‘Whilst the Bar Council is relieved to see that the planned court closures have been scaled back, we have previously expressed considerable concern about the lack of access to justice for people who find that they live many miles from their nearest court, and we remain concerned over the future.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll