header-logo header-logo

04 January 2018
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Candy brothers win High Court battle

Billionaire property developers the Candy brothers have won a three-year High Court case against a former friend.

Businessman Mark Holyoake accused the brothers of extortion, blackmail, intimidation and breach of data protection legislation among lurid allegations about their business dealings. However, Mr Justice Nugee cleared them of all charges.

Holyoake had sought £132m in damages, accusing the brothers of attempting to force him to pay £37m interest on a £12m loan used to develop a London mansion block.

Delivering his lengthy judgment in Holyoake v Candy [2017] EWHC 3397 (Ch), Nugee J said Holyoake ‘was not a naïve consumer’ but ‘a sophisticated borrower’ trying to make a profit from a business venture’, and even though the extension fees on the loan were ‘steep, the relationship between the parties was not unfair’.

Issue: 7775 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll