header-logo header-logo

03 April 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail

Cansford Laboratories: Live Q&A panel Monday 14 April 12pm

Join us on Monday 14 April at 12pm for a live Q&A panel where our experts tackle common misconceptions surrounding hair strand drug and alcohol testing

From cut-off levels and their impact on results to concerns about bias in testing, we’ll explore the rigorous processes that ensure the accuracy, fairness, and court-admissibility of hair analysis. This session is designed for legal professionals, social workers, and anyone relying on drug and alcohol testing in decision-making.

Come prepared with your questions or submit them in advance, our expert panel will be addressing them live, providing clear, science-backed insights into the complexities of hair testing.

About Cansford Labs

We are a UKAS-accredited laboratory providing fast, accurate drug, alcohol, and DNA testing from our state-of-the-art facility in Cardiff, Wales. With a three-working-day turnaround on results, we support professionals in family law, social care, education, and the workplace. Our nationwide sample collection service ensures quick and convenient testing, backed by nearly 30 years of expertise. As pioneers in hair testing, our founders introduced methods now used by laboratories worldwide, reinforcing our reputation as a trusted leader in the field.

Register now to secure your place!

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll