header-logo header-logo

18 May 2026
Categories: Legal News , Training & education , Diversity , Family
printer mail-detail

Memorial essay competition launched by 4PB for third year running

© 4PB

Family law chambers 4PB has announced the return of the Alan Inglis Memorial Essay Prize for a third consecutive year, honouring the life and legacy of LGBTQ+ advocate and barrister Alan Inglis (pictured)

The competition, which opened on 1 May, commemorates Inglis’ longstanding commitment to advancing LGBTQ+ rights and his unique contribution to the legal profession as the only family barrister qualified to practise in both England and Wales and Scotland.

This year’s essay question asks: 'What role can NCDR play in resolving LGBT+ family law disputes?'. Open to law students, bar school candidates and aspiring pupils, the competition offers a £500 prize for the winning essay, publication in NLJ online and a mini-pupillage opportunity with 4PB. A runner-up prize of £250 will also be awarded.

The winner will be announced at a reception hosted by 4PB in early June to coincide with Pride Month, alongside a seminar held in partnership with IPOS Mediation and HCR Law as part of London International Dispute Week. Submissions close on 27 May. More details can be found here.

Andrew Powell KC of 4PB said Alan Inglis was 'greatly missed by everyone who knew him', adding that the competition was 'a great way to celebrate and commemorate his life and work'. He praised Inglis’ dedication to supporting LGBTQ+ rights throughout his career, both before and after qualifying as a barrister.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll