header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Capacity assessment

mason

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Re Walker (Deceased) (unreported, 20 November 2014), Mrs Walker had separated from her husband of 26 years and lived for two years with her partner, Mr Badmin, who was 23 years her junior, and two years older than her oldest daughter. She made a will in January 2010, one month before she died of a brain tumour. Ancillary relief proceedings in relation to her divorce from Mr Walker were not concluded before her death. She left a life interest in her share of matrimonial assets to Mr Badmin and her residuary estate as to 50% to Mr Badmin and as to 25% to each of her daughters. She also signed a letter setting out her reasons for making the will in these terms (the letter).

Mrs Walker’s daughters challenged the will on the bases of lack of testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval. The daughters argued that the test for capacity should be that set out in the Mental Capacity Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll