header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Capacity assessment

mason

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Re Walker (Deceased) (unreported, 20 November 2014), Mrs Walker had separated from her husband of 26 years and lived for two years with her partner, Mr Badmin, who was 23 years her junior, and two years older than her oldest daughter. She made a will in January 2010, one month before she died of a brain tumour. Ancillary relief proceedings in relation to her divorce from Mr Walker were not concluded before her death. She left a life interest in her share of matrimonial assets to Mr Badmin and her residuary estate as to 50% to Mr Badmin and as to 25% to each of her daughters. She also signed a letter setting out her reasons for making the will in these terms (the letter).

Mrs Walker’s daughters challenged the will on the bases of lack of testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval. The daughters argued that the test for capacity should be that set out in the Mental Capacity Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll