header-logo header-logo

Capacity assessment

27 March 2015 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
mason

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Re Walker (Deceased) (unreported, 20 November 2014), Mrs Walker had separated from her husband of 26 years and lived for two years with her partner, Mr Badmin, who was 23 years her junior, and two years older than her oldest daughter. She made a will in January 2010, one month before she died of a brain tumour. Ancillary relief proceedings in relation to her divorce from Mr Walker were not concluded before her death. She left a life interest in her share of matrimonial assets to Mr Badmin and her residuary estate as to 50% to Mr Badmin and as to 25% to each of her daughters. She also signed a letter setting out her reasons for making the will in these terms (the letter).

Mrs Walker’s daughters challenged the will on the bases of lack of testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval. The daughters argued that the test for capacity should be that set out in the Mental Capacity Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll