header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Capacity assessment

mason

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Re Walker (Deceased) (unreported, 20 November 2014), Mrs Walker had separated from her husband of 26 years and lived for two years with her partner, Mr Badmin, who was 23 years her junior, and two years older than her oldest daughter. She made a will in January 2010, one month before she died of a brain tumour. Ancillary relief proceedings in relation to her divorce from Mr Walker were not concluded before her death. She left a life interest in her share of matrimonial assets to Mr Badmin and her residuary estate as to 50% to Mr Badmin and as to 25% to each of her daughters. She also signed a letter setting out her reasons for making the will in these terms (the letter).

Mrs Walker’s daughters challenged the will on the bases of lack of testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval. The daughters argued that the test for capacity should be that set out in the Mental Capacity Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll