header-logo header-logo

Capacity to consent?

21 January 2022 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail
69145
Nicholas Dobson analyses a key Supreme Court decision on capacity to consent to sexual relations
  • The capacity to consent to a sexual relationship requires an understanding that the proposed sexual partner must also be able to consent to sex and must consent before and throughout the sexual activity.

‘Nobody,’ asserted Margaret Atwood in The Handmaid’s Tale, ‘dies from lack of sex. It’s lack of love we die from’. That may well be so. But for many people, sexual engagement is a significant way of expressing sexual love, particularly with a long-term partner. For others, however, sex is, or feels like, a pressing human need. And love isn’t necessarily part of the equation.

But what of those with, as the Supreme Court recently put it, ‘an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain which potentially renders them unable to make a decision for themselves concerning sexual relations’? Bearing in mind (among other things) the crucial importance of consent in sexual activity (see, for instance, ss

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll