header-logo header-logo

Capacity to consent?

21 January 2022 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail
69145
Nicholas Dobson analyses a key Supreme Court decision on capacity to consent to sexual relations
  • The capacity to consent to a sexual relationship requires an understanding that the proposed sexual partner must also be able to consent to sex and must consent before and throughout the sexual activity.

‘Nobody,’ asserted Margaret Atwood in The Handmaid’s Tale, ‘dies from lack of sex. It’s lack of love we die from’. That may well be so. But for many people, sexual engagement is a significant way of expressing sexual love, particularly with a long-term partner. For others, however, sex is, or feels like, a pressing human need. And love isn’t necessarily part of the equation.

But what of those with, as the Supreme Court recently put it, ‘an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain which potentially renders them unable to make a decision for themselves concerning sexual relations’? Bearing in mind (among other things) the crucial importance of consent in sexual activity (see, for instance, ss

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll