header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Capital gains tax

Trustees of Morrison 2002 Maintenance Trust and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKUT 300 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 65 (Aug)

The First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)(the FTT) had not erred in deciding that the transaction entered into by the trustees of a family trust and the settlor of those trusts, involving the disposal of certain shares effected by means of a tax avoidance scheme, had amounted to a single composite transaction in which the trustees had disposed of the shares at or about market value on which substantial capital gains tax (CGT) was chargeable. The Upper Tribunal (Tax Chamber) so held in dismissing the appellants’ appeal against the FTT’s decision to uphold closure notices issued by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners amending the taxpayers’ self-assessment returns so as to increase the chargeable gains accruing for CGT.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll