header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010 / Ed Mitchell
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Care needs in hard times

Ed Mitchell reports on council & court failures to deliver community care

Increasingly, local authorities are having to take hard decisions about the provision of community care services. The Court of Appeal’s decision in R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2010] EWCA Civ 1109, in which it determined a judicial review claim at first instance, is the latest to confirm that it is for an authority to decide how it deploys its community care resources. In other words, the hard decisions are essentially for local authorities to take and not the courts. Accordingly, an authority was entitled to decide to meet an eligible community care need for assistance safely to urinate at night by supplying continence pads rather than the more expensive option of funding a night carer (R v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council ex parte Daykin [1998] 1 CCLR 512).

Other aspects of the Court of Appeal’s decision are also of note. The court held that if a local authority has decided precisely to define an eligible need

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll