header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Rona Epstein
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care , Employment
printer mail-detail

Caring for Carers

Does current legislation do enough to protect the rights of the UK's millions of unpaid carers? asks Rona Epstein

In the 2001 census, 5.2 million people in and identified themselves as providing unpaid care to support family members, friends, neighbours or others because of long-term physical or mental ill-health, disability or old age. That represented nearly 10% of the population, and of those, 21% (1.09 million) provided care for 50 or more hours per week. This unpaid work has been valued at £87bn a year.

 

BACKGROUND

The Carers (Recognition and Services) Act 1995 (C(RS)A 1995) provided that when a local authority assesses someone’s needs for community care services or the needs of a disabled child, a person who provides/ intends to provide substantial regular care for that person has the right to request an assessment of his ability to provide and to continue to provide care. The authority must take that assessment into account when making any decision about services for the cared-for person

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll