header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / Ed Mitchell
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Caring matters

Part two: Ed Mitchell provides an update on fair access, mental capacity & welfare reform

* * * * * *

In response to the Commission for Social Care Inspection's recent review of the operation of eligibility criteria in England, the Department of Health says it intends to “rework” the Fair Access to Care Services (FACS) guidance, with public consultation planned for spring 2009.

Service diversion

One key concern of the department is that the current system diverts resources away from preventative services. In R(Chavda) & Others v Harrow LBC [2007] EWHC 3064 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 337 (Dec), the High Court confirmed that, as a general rule, it is lawful for a local authority only to fund services to meet needs which are “critical” under the FACS guidance. Given the way in which the FACS guidance describes critical needs, this ruling has led many authorities to continue to starve preventative services of resources. This may be tackled by the new guidance, perhaps by placing a higher priority on preventative services within the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll