THIS ISSUE
Geoffrey Bindman recalls communist intrigue and underhand government manoeuvres
R v JTB [2009] UKHL 20, [2009] All ER (D) 211 (Apr)
The new concept of indirect disability discrimination is set to cause confusion, say Naomi Feinstein & Helena Davies
News in brief
Warning that payments to lawyers and firms alike have potential to mislead
News in brief
Nicholas Bevan & Andrew Stinchcombe trace the road ahead for pleural plaque compensation
Employment
Is the weight of legislation affecting the administration of justice? James Kirby reports
MOVERS & SHAKERS
FOIL—Bridget Tatham
Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=1d8709f4_1)
Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair
Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London
Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson
Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor
NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
