header-logo header-logo

The waiting game

Nicholas Bevan & Andrew Stinchcombe trace the road ahead for pleural plaque compensation

* * * * * *

On 1 April 2009 Gordon Brown was asked at Prime Minister's Question Time by Stephen Hepburn MP (Lab) what he intended to do about the thousands of pleural plaques sufferers “who have been robbed of their compensation by unjust decisions in the law courts?” The prime minister stated that those suffering from asbestos diseases deserved the best of help from the public authorities and that it was right that the government looked again at this issue.

Pleural plaques are localised areas of pleural thickening which usually develop on the membrane (pleura) covering the lung and lining the inside of the rib cage. They are the most common respiratory disease caused by asbestos dust and in the vast majority of cases, they do not cause any symptoms and their presence is determined by chest X-ray or CT scans.

Insurers challenge—Rothwell

A trio of High Court decisions in the 1980s made it possible for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll