header-logo header-logo

The waiting game

Nicholas Bevan & Andrew Stinchcombe trace the road ahead for pleural plaque compensation

* * * * * *

On 1 April 2009 Gordon Brown was asked at Prime Minister's Question Time by Stephen Hepburn MP (Lab) what he intended to do about the thousands of pleural plaques sufferers “who have been robbed of their compensation by unjust decisions in the law courts?” The prime minister stated that those suffering from asbestos diseases deserved the best of help from the public authorities and that it was right that the government looked again at this issue.

Pleural plaques are localised areas of pleural thickening which usually develop on the membrane (pleura) covering the lung and lining the inside of the rib cage. They are the most common respiratory disease caused by asbestos dust and in the vast majority of cases, they do not cause any symptoms and their presence is determined by chest X-ray or CT scans.

Insurers challenge—Rothwell

A trio of High Court decisions in the 1980s made it possible for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll