header-logo header-logo

The waiting game

Nicholas Bevan & Andrew Stinchcombe trace the road ahead for pleural plaque compensation

* * * * * *

On 1 April 2009 Gordon Brown was asked at Prime Minister's Question Time by Stephen Hepburn MP (Lab) what he intended to do about the thousands of pleural plaques sufferers “who have been robbed of their compensation by unjust decisions in the law courts?” The prime minister stated that those suffering from asbestos diseases deserved the best of help from the public authorities and that it was right that the government looked again at this issue.

Pleural plaques are localised areas of pleural thickening which usually develop on the membrane (pleura) covering the lung and lining the inside of the rib cage. They are the most common respiratory disease caused by asbestos dust and in the vast majority of cases, they do not cause any symptoms and their presence is determined by chest X-ray or CT scans.

Insurers challenge—Rothwell

A trio of High Court decisions in the 1980s made it possible for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll