Is the weight of legislation affecting the administration of justice? James Kirby reports
In R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467, [2008] All ER (D) 170 (Oct) Mr Chambers had pleaded guilty to an offence under s 170(1)(b) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979.
Put briefly, 600kg of tobacco had been smuggled in to the UK from Belgium. Mr Chambers and a co-defendant were later found on commercial premises in Kent with keys to lockups containing that tobacco: £66,120 of duty had not been paid. It was never the Crown’s case that Mr Chambers had been involved in the importation, but was rather concerned in warehousing the tobacco for onward sale.
But under the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement, Warehousing and REDS) Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/3135) the smuggler or his “consignee” are liable for the evasion of the duty payable on imported goods such as tobacco. The trial judge concluded that Mr Chambers had obtained a pecuniary advantage equal to the value of the unpaid duty. A confiscation order was made
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=77dbbdb7_1)
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=b3bea7f_1)
