19 April 2012 / Ed Mitchell

Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Public

printer

mail-detail

Caring & sharing?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ed Mitchell provides an update on community care law

Increasingly, local authorities are having to take hard decisions about how they deploy the limited resources available to them for the provision of community care services. In R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33, [2011] 4 All ER 881 the Supreme Court confirmed that it is principally for a local authority to take these hard decisions in individual cases, not the courts. So, once a local authority had formally reassessed community care needs, it was entitled to decide to save some £250 per week by supplying continence aids rather than funding a night-time carer.

McDonald

The case concerned a 67-year-old woman left unable to mobilise unaided by a stroke. While she needed to urinate about three times per night, she was not incontinent. There were two options for managing the claimant’s night-time continence needs. The first, favoured by the claimant, was for a night-time carer to help her to a commode. The second cheaper option, which the claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Caring & sharing?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ed Mitchell provides an update on community care law

Increasingly, local authorities are having to take hard decisions about how they deploy the limited resources available to them for the provision of community care services. In R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33, [2011] 4 All ER 881 the Supreme Court confirmed that it is principally for a local authority to take these hard decisions in individual cases, not the courts. So, once a local authority had formally reassessed community care needs, it was entitled to decide to save some £250 per week by supplying continence aids rather than funding a night-time carer.

McDonald

The case concerned a 67-year-old woman left unable to mobilise unaided by a stroke. While she needed to urinate about three times per night, she was not incontinent. There were two options for managing the claimant’s night-time continence needs. The first, favoured by the claimant, was for a night-time carer to help her to a commode. The second cheaper option, which the claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

back-to-top-scroll