header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

CARLILE WARNING

In brief

Control orders are “necessary and justifiable”, according to the findings of an independent review conducted by Lord Carlile of Berriew QC, the government’s terror watchdog. Carlile found the orders were necessary because of the risk of terrorist attacks, and that they were being used cautiously. “The process is rigorous and structured in an appropriate way, so that the decisions are definitely those of the Home Secretary himself, not his officials,” he writes. However, he warns: “The greatest care must be taken to ensure that the orders are used only in those cases where there is a clear intention to put the stated desire into effect, as opposed to extravagant expressions of support or wishes.”

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll