header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

CARLILE WARNING

In brief

Control orders are “necessary and justifiable”, according to the findings of an independent review conducted by Lord Carlile of Berriew QC, the government’s terror watchdog. Carlile found the orders were necessary because of the risk of terrorist attacks, and that they were being used cautiously. “The process is rigorous and structured in an appropriate way, so that the decisions are definitely those of the Home Secretary himself, not his officials,” he writes. However, he warns: “The greatest care must be taken to ensure that the orders are used only in those cases where there is a clear intention to put the stated desire into effect, as opposed to extravagant expressions of support or wishes.”

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll