header-logo header-logo

Is cash king?

27 June 2014 / Ferdinand Lovett
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce
printer mail-detail
lawinheadlines_lovett

Ferdinand Lovett considers the potential impact of the recent Budget changes on pensions on divorce

Courts dealing with divorce settlements have historically treated the pension rights of either divorcing party differently from other assets, such as savings, shares or property. For the time being, this makes sense: pension rights are, in most cases, illiquid assets in comparison to other forms of property. They are used to obtain a stable future income stream rather than cash for the here and now.

But will this all change from April 2015, if the proposed liberalisation of the rules governing access to defined contribution (DC) pension savings hit the statute books in substantially the same shape as set out in the 2014 Budget? Certainly, the recent Queen’s Speech indicates this is still the plan (“Legislation will be brought forward to give those who have saved discretion over the use of their retirement funds.”)

Broadly, it is proposed that everyone will have the flexibility to take their DC benefits from age 55 “whenever and however they wish”, regardless of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll