header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2017 / Henry Hood
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

​Cashing out a second time

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7732_hood

Henry Hood discusses further developments in the interaction between bankruptcy & divorce cases

  • A claim under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 could never be property capable of vesting in a trustee in bankruptcy.

This article follows one which I wrote concerning the matter of Ian Robert (Trustee and Bankruptcy of Mr. Elichaoff deceased) v Sarah Jane Duncanson Woodall [2016] EWHC 538 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 233 (Mar) which was concerned with the interaction of the laws relating to bankruptcy and divorce (see “Cashing out”, NLJ, 10 June 2016, p 7).

As I then described, some of the applications made by the trustee in bankruptcy were positively surreal. This applied in particular to the trustee’s application that he should be allowed to pursue lump sum and property adjustment orders under ss 23 & 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) against the bankrupt’s former wife. In reporting the dismissal of such an application (which is ludicrous at first blush, and does not improve on further consideration), I little

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll