header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7732

03 February 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Egeneonu v Egeneonu [2017] EWHC 43 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 69 (Jan)

Nicholas Griffin QC considers the CJEU Watson decision on UK surveillance law

 

Michael Zander QC picks out crucial passages from the Supreme Court judgment on the triggering of Art 50

Henry Hood discusses further developments in the interaction between bankruptcy & divorce cases

Petrosaudi Oil Services (Venezuela) Ltd v Novo Banco S.A. and others [2017] EWCA Civ 9, [2017] All ER (D) 92 (Jan)

Brexit & other horizon scanning, by Enid Rowlands

Wood and another v TUI Travel plc (trading as First Choice) [2017] EWCA Civ 11, [2017] All ER (D) 53 (Jan)

Is the sharing of overseas pensions now at an end, asks Kerry Fretwell

Steve Foster examines press intrusion into celebrity privacy & the decision in Kaye v Robertson

Why has it taken so long for football sex abuse scandal to be uncovered, asks Richard Scorer

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll