header-logo header-logo

Art 50: the judgment (Pt 1)

03 February 2017 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Features , Public , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail
nlj_7732_zander

Michael Zander QC picks out crucial passages from the Supreme Court judgment on the triggering of Art 50

  • R (Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5

  • The majority: Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Mance, Kerr, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge.

Lord Neuberger, President, announcing the decision, said that all the justices had taken part in the preparation of the judgment.

The main issue

“The main issue on this appeal concerns the ability of ministers to bring about changes in domestic law by exercising their powers at the international level.” (at [5])

The royal prerogative cannot be used to change the law

“It is a fundamental principle of the UK constitution that, unless primary legislation permits it, the Royal prerogative does not enable ministers to change statute law or common law. As Lord Hoffmann observed in R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2) [2009] AC 453, para 44, ‘since the 17th century the prerogative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

Mike Wilson, managing partner of Blake Morgan chair of the CBI’s South-East Council, reflects on his career the challenges that have defined him

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Partner joins commercial property team in Birmingham

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

NEWS
Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions
NLJ is inviting its readers to take part in this year’s annual reader research, a short survey designed to help shape the future direction of the magazine. The questionnaire consists of just eight quick questions and offers an opportunity for legal professionals to share their views on the content, coverage and issues that matter most to them.
The Law Society has urged regulators not to ban the term ‘no win no fee’, as the profession contemplates measures to prevent a disaster like the SSB Group collapse from happening again
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest
CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has been granted permission to appeal Mazur, a decision which has caused consternation among litigation firms
back-to-top-scroll