header-logo header-logo

03 February 2017
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Egeneonu v Egeneonu [2017] EWHC 43 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 69 (Jan)

The Family Division dismissed a mother’s application for a declaration that contempts of court, which had been found proved against a father for his breach of orders made in family proceedings, by failing to return their children from Nigeria, constituted criminal offences and, together, an extradition offence. The children in question had been made wards of court following their removal to Nigeria. The court considered the principles which applied to wardship and contempt and held that any assertion that the contempts found proved in the present case were criminal because the children were wards of court was unsupported by authority and wrong both in principle and in law. It further held that it could not find the father in criminal contempt in circumstances where the judge in the committal hearing had not so found and where criminal contempt had not been pleaded in respect of that application.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll