header-logo header-logo

Football focus

03 February 2017 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7732_scorer

Why has it taken so long for football sex abuse scandal to be uncovered, asks Richard Scorer

In a media interview in November 2016, former Sheffield United footballer Andy Woodward spoke publicly about sexual abuse he experienced while he was a youth player at Crewe Alexandra. Woodward waived his anonymity to tell The Guardian that he was raped more times than he could remember. His revelations, which were quickly followed by disclosures from other former players, set off a tidal wave of media publicity and debate about sexual abuse in football. A few weeks later the NSPCC revealed that the number of calls to their dedicated football abuse hotline helpline had exceeded even the number in the early days of the Jimmy Savile scandal. Multiple police investigations are underway, implicating nearly 250 clubs. This is clearly a major scandal. But why football, and why now?

Power, deference & fear

To anyone acquainted with the nature and causes of child abuse, what is now being exposed in football is unsurprising. The common threads linking the many child

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
back-to-top-scroll