header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Catherine Urquhart
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Casting aspersions

urquhart

Catherine Urquhart reports on a new frontier in discrimination law

There has recently been extensive discussion of whether discrimination on the basis of one’s caste may be prohibited by s 9(1) of the Equality Act 2010, which bans discrimination on the grounds of race.

On 19 December 2014 Mr Justice Langstaff handed down his judgment in the first Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case to consider caste-based discrimination, Chandhok v Tirkey UKEAT/0190/14/KN, [2015] All ER (D) 91 (Jan).

Ms Tirkey had alleged that her employers, Mr and Mrs Chandhok, had discriminated against her in part due to her low status in the caste system. At a preliminary hearing, Employment Judge Sigsworth had refused to strike out the amendment claiming caste-based discrimination, and the respondents appealed.

Section 9(1) of the Equality Act 2010 defines “race” as including: (a) colour; (b) nationality; (c) ethnic or national origins. There is currently no reference to caste in this sub-section.

Langstaff P considered Mandla v Dowell Lee [1983] 2 AC 548, [1983] 1 All ER 1062 (the case which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll