header-logo header-logo

06 December 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The cat says…thou shalt not blaspheme!

Athelstane Aamodt explores recent examples of blasphemy law in action & the human rights conflicts that arose

  • Discusses recent, high-profile blasphemy cases.
  • Looks at underlying human rights conflicts, relevant European Convention articles, serious harm and the Digital Single Market.

The law of blasphemy has been in the news a great deal recently. At the end of October the Republic of Ireland voted in a referendum to repeal the country’s blasphemy law (contained in s 36 of the Defamation Act 2009), the existence of which became something of a cause celebre when the comedian Stephen Fry in 2017 referred to God as a ‘maniac’ on Irish television prompting an investigation by Irish police. There has also been the recent case of Asia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani woman who has spent the last eight years on death row in Pakistan but whose conviction was quashed by the Pakistani Supreme Court last month. Laws against blasphemy might seem like a vestige of another time, but according to a report of the US Commission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll