header-logo header-logo

06 December 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The cat says…thou shalt not blaspheme!

Athelstane Aamodt explores recent examples of blasphemy law in action & the human rights conflicts that arose

  • Discusses recent, high-profile blasphemy cases.
  • Looks at underlying human rights conflicts, relevant European Convention articles, serious harm and the Digital Single Market.

The law of blasphemy has been in the news a great deal recently. At the end of October the Republic of Ireland voted in a referendum to repeal the country’s blasphemy law (contained in s 36 of the Defamation Act 2009), the existence of which became something of a cause celebre when the comedian Stephen Fry in 2017 referred to God as a ‘maniac’ on Irish television prompting an investigation by Irish police. There has also been the recent case of Asia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani woman who has spent the last eight years on death row in Pakistan but whose conviction was quashed by the Pakistani Supreme Court last month. Laws against blasphemy might seem like a vestige of another time, but according to a report of the US Commission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll