header-logo header-logo

The cat says…thou shalt not blaspheme!

06 December 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Defamation , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Athelstane Aamodt explores recent examples of blasphemy law in action & the human rights conflicts that arose

  • Discusses recent, high-profile blasphemy cases.
  • Looks at underlying human rights conflicts, relevant European Convention articles, serious harm and the Digital Single Market.

The law of blasphemy has been in the news a great deal recently. At the end of October the Republic of Ireland voted in a referendum to repeal the country’s blasphemy law (contained in s 36 of the Defamation Act 2009), the existence of which became something of a cause celebre when the comedian Stephen Fry in 2017 referred to God as a ‘maniac’ on Irish television prompting an investigation by Irish police. There has also been the recent case of Asia Bibi, a Christian Pakistani woman who has spent the last eight years on death row in Pakistan but whose conviction was quashed by the Pakistani Supreme Court last month. Laws against blasphemy might seem like a vestige of another time, but according to a report of the US Commission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll