header-logo header-logo

01 April 2026
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Personal injury , Compensation , Damages
printer mail-detail

Catastrophic payment scheme 'falling short'

Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer

The highest payment in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS) was £500,000 in April 1996—and has remained the same since. Had it been increased by inflation, in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), it would now be £1,015,284, according to the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Calling for a review, Kim Harrison, immediate past president of APIL, said: ‘The payment is for victims of crime with the most catastrophic injuries, including brain damage and paralysis.

‘It should be recognised that the amount established when the cap was set in 1996 will not go as far in today’s money, three decades on... provision for injured victims of crime has been left to fester... This scheme is falling short, including in terms of eligibility, time limits on bringing claims, and keeping in-step with modern crimes including online grooming.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll