header-logo header-logo

01 April 2026
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Personal injury , Compensation , Damages
printer mail-detail

Catastrophic payment scheme 'falling short'

Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer

The highest payment in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS) was £500,000 in April 1996—and has remained the same since. Had it been increased by inflation, in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), it would now be £1,015,284, according to the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Calling for a review, Kim Harrison, immediate past president of APIL, said: ‘The payment is for victims of crime with the most catastrophic injuries, including brain damage and paralysis.

‘It should be recognised that the amount established when the cap was set in 1996 will not go as far in today’s money, three decades on... provision for injured victims of crime has been left to fester... This scheme is falling short, including in terms of eligibility, time limits on bringing claims, and keeping in-step with modern crimes including online grooming.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll