header-logo header-logo

A cautionary tale

04 September 2009 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-Gardner
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Clark v Lucas Solicitors serves as a timely warning for conveyancing solicitors say Mark Sefton & Oliver Radley-Gardner

Conveyancing solicitors acting for residential developers should be aware of the cautionary tale told by Clark v Lucas Solicitors LLP [2009] EWHC 1952 (Ch). Adrian and Heather Clark were the purchasers of a house on a new residential development in Monmouthshire. The purchase price was £560,000. The seller was the developer, a company called Gainsborough Homes Ltd.

The overall funding for the development had been provided in the main loan facility from Natwest Bank plc, but in part also by some lending from an individual called Michael Kenny. The Natwest Bank naturally had a first charge over the whole of the development site to protect the bulk of the finance, and Mr Kenny had a second charge, also over the whole of the site, to protect his own financial input. Both of these were all monies charges, in the sense that they provided the lenders with security for the full amount of whatever might be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll