header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Chain reaction

Brent McDonald investigates a defendant’s liability for injuries sustained by a claimant in a subsequent incident

In Dalling v RJ Heale & Co [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr) the Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the defendant was liable for injuries suffered in accidents that occurred three years apart.

Following on from Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] 1 AC 884, [2008] 2 All ER 943, Dalling is a further appellate case dealing with the difficult question of the point at which a claimant can no longer recover for the ongoing consequences of a defendant’s tort.

Facts of Dalling

On 4 March 2005, the claimant suffered a severe head injury while working for the defendant. The head injury included an extensive right petrous bone fracture and extensive frontal contusions leading to brain swelling.

Surprisingly the claimant suffered no significant cognitive or intellectual deficit, but was left with executive dysfunction. This led to poor concentration, short attention span, impaired memory, some loss of emotional control, variation of mood, fatigue,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll