header-logo header-logo

Chain reaction

29 September 2011 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Brent McDonald investigates a defendant’s liability for injuries sustained by a claimant in a subsequent incident

In Dalling v RJ Heale & Co [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr) the Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the defendant was liable for injuries suffered in accidents that occurred three years apart.

Following on from Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] 1 AC 884, [2008] 2 All ER 943, Dalling is a further appellate case dealing with the difficult question of the point at which a claimant can no longer recover for the ongoing consequences of a defendant’s tort.

Facts of Dalling

On 4 March 2005, the claimant suffered a severe head injury while working for the defendant. The head injury included an extensive right petrous bone fracture and extensive frontal contusions leading to brain swelling.

Surprisingly the claimant suffered no significant cognitive or intellectual deficit, but was left with executive dysfunction. This led to poor concentration, short attention span, impaired memory, some loss of emotional control, variation of mood, fatigue,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll