header-logo header-logo

Chain reaction

29 September 2011 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Brent McDonald investigates a defendant’s liability for injuries sustained by a claimant in a subsequent incident

In Dalling v RJ Heale & Co [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr) the Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the defendant was liable for injuries suffered in accidents that occurred three years apart.

Following on from Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] 1 AC 884, [2008] 2 All ER 943, Dalling is a further appellate case dealing with the difficult question of the point at which a claimant can no longer recover for the ongoing consequences of a defendant’s tort.

Facts of Dalling

On 4 March 2005, the claimant suffered a severe head injury while working for the defendant. The head injury included an extensive right petrous bone fracture and extensive frontal contusions leading to brain swelling.

Surprisingly the claimant suffered no significant cognitive or intellectual deficit, but was left with executive dysfunction. This led to poor concentration, short attention span, impaired memory, some loss of emotional control, variation of mood, fatigue,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll