header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Joe Reevy
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Profession , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Challenge Churchill

What would Churchill do to meet the threat of a new wave of law firms, asks Joe Reevy

Recently, the BBC journalists went on strike and the Today programme on Radio 4 was largely replaced with “filler” material. One of these was Lord Digby-Jones’ appraisal of the life of Churchill, whom he described as probably the greatest Englishman of all time. What struck me about the narrative was that it concentrated on the fact that Churchill wasn’t over-bright, wasn’t a visionary, made many mistakes and so on…but he was undoubtedly an extremely effective and able leader and absolutely the sort of person you need calling the shots when things are at their gloomiest, as they are now.

His career was also made by taking a view which was flatly contrary to the received wisdom of the day.

Valuing your people

  • was thinking about how if you were to look at him from the perspective that many law firms take to their people, ie valuing being error-free, bright and forward-thinking), then you wouldn’t have Churchill
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll