header-logo header-logo

Chancery Lane warns against “risky” SRA proposals

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hundreds of law firms could be struck off residential conveyancing panels under Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposals, the Law Society has warned.

The Law Society took aim at the SRA over its “possibly highly risky” proposals for regulatory reform.

The wide-ranging SRA proposals, set out in a quartet of consultations on 7 May, affect solicitors’ indemnity insurance, the compensation fund, multi-disciplinary practices and accountants reports. They include lowering the level of professional indemnity insurance (PII) cover required to £550,000 coupled with a requirement to demonstrate that the firm has sufficient cover in place to protect clients, and reducing run-off to three years.

Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson says: “To use the example of PII from the very many consultation proposals, firms, insurers and brokers will simply have insufficient time to adjust their businesses in time for the 1 October implementation which could mean that no cover will be provided for lenders in residential house transactions. Yet these changes could see the immediate removal from panels of hundreds of firms.” 

Hudson says the proposals have raised expectations among some firms that they would benefit from cuts in PII premiums and fewer reporting obligations. He argued that six weeks was too short for the consultation.

“The lending institutions have already made clear that if the removal of client protections proposals go ahead, lenders will act swiftly to minimise their exposure to risk,” he says. 

“More time needs to be given to allow the market to produce new insurance products and to educate firms and consumers.”

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll