header-logo header-logo

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Chancery Lane warns against “risky” SRA proposals

Hundreds of law firms could be struck off residential conveyancing panels under Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposals, the Law Society has warned.

The Law Society took aim at the SRA over its “possibly highly risky” proposals for regulatory reform.

The wide-ranging SRA proposals, set out in a quartet of consultations on 7 May, affect solicitors’ indemnity insurance, the compensation fund, multi-disciplinary practices and accountants reports. They include lowering the level of professional indemnity insurance (PII) cover required to £550,000 coupled with a requirement to demonstrate that the firm has sufficient cover in place to protect clients, and reducing run-off to three years.

Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson says: “To use the example of PII from the very many consultation proposals, firms, insurers and brokers will simply have insufficient time to adjust their businesses in time for the 1 October implementation which could mean that no cover will be provided for lenders in residential house transactions. Yet these changes could see the immediate removal from panels of hundreds of firms.” 

Hudson says the proposals have raised expectations among some firms that they would benefit from cuts in PII premiums and fewer reporting obligations. He argued that six weeks was too short for the consultation.

“The lending institutions have already made clear that if the removal of client protections proposals go ahead, lenders will act swiftly to minimise their exposure to risk,” he says. 

“More time needs to be given to allow the market to produce new insurance products and to educate firms and consumers.”

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll