header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 June 2015 / Chris Nillesen
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Change happens

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7655_nillesen

Contractual changes can be agreed despite not meeting contract formalities, says Chris Nillesen

The recent cases of Globe Motors Inc and others v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd [2014] EHWC 3718 (Comm) and Virulite LLC v Virulite Distribution Ltd [2014] EHWC 366 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 37 (Mar) serve as timely reminders of the importance of understanding how changes to contracts can be agreed and what contracting parties should be aware of.

Forever friends

Long term contractual relationships, whether for the acquisition of goods or services are invariably subject to change. Prices, laws, contracting parties, technology, standards and practices all change over time. Contracts depending on their length, value and scope can address such changes through a variety of measures. However it is advisable for the parties to consider at the outset how changes will be managed and in particular who should bear the cost of change. Simply ignoring the likelihood and the implication of change could instigate a contractual dispute.

The Globe case was a complex dispute regarding the design of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll