header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A change of PACE

How can the Home Office make the most of the consultation process for PACE reform? Michael Zander QC reports

The Home Office published a summary of responses to its consultation exercise on the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) on 31 July 2007.

The consultation was launched on 16 March 2007. The consultation paper, Modernising Police Powers, had nine substantive pages raising a longish list of topics and possible ideas. Views were sought by 31 May 2007.
It turns out, however, that this is merely the first stage in a lengthy process. In a covering note to the summary of responses, the Home Office stated that the fruits of this consultation would be used to guide phase 2, which would consist of “regional seminars with stakeholders and practitioners and a programme of bilateral meetings with key stakeholders”.

The aim of these meetings is “to establish the evidence for and practical benefits of change and to look at the impact of implementation and delivery”. More prosaically, this might be rephrased “the aim of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll