header-logo header-logo

Change starts now

03 October 2025 / Barbara Mills KC
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Opinion , Harassment , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
231396
In the wake of the Harman review, Barbara Mills KC sets out the Bar Council’s response

There is no place for bullying, harassment or sexual harassment at the Bar. Despite this fact and the work that has been done to date, misconduct continues to persist. But thanks to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s independent review, commissioned by the Bar Council, that is about to change.

The review’s inception

In 2023, Bar Council research found that an increasing number of barristers were experiencing or witnessing inappropriate and unacceptable behaviour within their chambers, workplaces and in courts. Just under half (44%) of barristers surveyed said they had experienced or observed these behaviours while working over the previous two years, an increase from 38% in 2021 and 31% in 2017. Those who were more at risk were women, people of colour and junior members of the Bar, as well as Bar students. The majority of perpetrators were found to be those with power or influence, such as senior barristers, judges, senior clerks and practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll