header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025 / Barbara Mills KC
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Opinion , Harassment , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Change starts now

231396
In the wake of the Harman review, Barbara Mills KC sets out the Bar Council’s response

There is no place for bullying, harassment or sexual harassment at the Bar. Despite this fact and the work that has been done to date, misconduct continues to persist. But thanks to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s independent review, commissioned by the Bar Council, that is about to change.

The review’s inception

In 2023, Bar Council research found that an increasing number of barristers were experiencing or witnessing inappropriate and unacceptable behaviour within their chambers, workplaces and in courts. Just under half (44%) of barristers surveyed said they had experienced or observed these behaviours while working over the previous two years, an increase from 38% in 2021 and 31% in 2017. Those who were more at risk were women, people of colour and junior members of the Bar, as well as Bar students. The majority of perpetrators were found to be those with power or influence, such as senior barristers, judges, senior clerks and practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll