header-logo header-logo

Change starts now

03 October 2025 / Barbara Mills KC
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Opinion , Harassment , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
231396
In the wake of the Harman review, Barbara Mills KC sets out the Bar Council’s response

There is no place for bullying, harassment or sexual harassment at the Bar. Despite this fact and the work that has been done to date, misconduct continues to persist. But thanks to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s independent review, commissioned by the Bar Council, that is about to change.

The review’s inception

In 2023, Bar Council research found that an increasing number of barristers were experiencing or witnessing inappropriate and unacceptable behaviour within their chambers, workplaces and in courts. Just under half (44%) of barristers surveyed said they had experienced or observed these behaviours while working over the previous two years, an increase from 38% in 2021 and 31% in 2017. Those who were more at risk were women, people of colour and junior members of the Bar, as well as Bar students. The majority of perpetrators were found to be those with power or influence, such as senior barristers, judges, senior clerks and practice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll