header-logo header-logo

Changes galore for civil law

12 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

An “earth-moving” series of changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force on 6 April.

Writing in NLJ this week, District Judge Stephen Gold relates the key changes on costs budgets, and charging and attachment applications.

He advises that the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2016 (SI 2016/234) on multi-track costs management now “effectively forbid completion of anything but the first page summary of precedent H where the value of the claim as stated on the claim form is less than £50,000 (so don’t certify the value at not exceeding £50,000 unless you suffer from costs managementitis)”.

Costs management is now disapplied in relation to litigants in person where the claimant is a child or where the court otherwise orders.

Gold reports that “there is a new creature on the block—the agreed budget discussion report”. This is to be filed no later than seven days before the first case management conference in the event that precedents H have gone in.

On charging and attachment, all new non-high court applications from 6 April must be made to the County Court Money Claims Centre, and other amendments to the regime also apply. Should the judgment debtor or anyone else served wish to challenge the making of a final charging order then they must file and serve written evidence stating the grounds of objection within 28 days after service of the interim order.

Meanwhile a two year pilot has commenced as from 1 April 2016 for insolvency express trials which will run in the Bankruptcy and Companies Court of the High Court.

Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll