header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7694

15 April 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

R (on the application of AA (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 167, [2016] All ER (D) 44 (Apr)

Michalak v General Medical Council [2016] EWCA Civ 172, [2016] All ER (D) 206 (Mar)

Should bell-ringing be recognised as a sport, asks Simon Boyes

Holcim (Romania) SA v European Commission C-556/14 P, [2016] All ER (D) 52 (Apr)

Walapu v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2016] EWHC 658 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 17 (Apr)

Roger Smith reports on legal developments at home & away

 

National Crime Agency v Simkus [2016] EWHC 728 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 47 (Apr)

Martin Burns considers the situations when mediation may be unsuitable

Khawar Qureshi QC provides an update on recent accusations of arbitrator bias

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll