header-logo header-logo

Do not pass go

15 April 2016 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7694_burns

Martin Burns considers the situations when mediation may be unsuitable

Mediation is a practical and sensible method for resolving an immense range of disputes. There is plenty of first-hand testimony to demonstrate the effectiveness of mediation, and it is increasingly being used in both commercial and consumer markets.

It is particularly useful where parties want to be in charge of the process and timetable, and retain control over the ultimate decision on their dispute. Mediation is nearly always the right way to go when parties believe their differences can be resolved through discussion, and they are willing to cooperate in finding solutions.

Parties often want to resolve their differences in private, particularly if they are worried about the possibility of commercially sensitive or personal issues becoming public, as would happen if their dispute ended up in court. Mediation is especially attractive where there is desire to maintain continuing relationships, which could be damaged in adversarial forums such as arbitration or litigation.

But mediation may not always be suitable. There are certain situations where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll