header-logo header-logo

Do not pass go

15 April 2016 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7694_burns

Martin Burns considers the situations when mediation may be unsuitable

Mediation is a practical and sensible method for resolving an immense range of disputes. There is plenty of first-hand testimony to demonstrate the effectiveness of mediation, and it is increasingly being used in both commercial and consumer markets.

It is particularly useful where parties want to be in charge of the process and timetable, and retain control over the ultimate decision on their dispute. Mediation is nearly always the right way to go when parties believe their differences can be resolved through discussion, and they are willing to cooperate in finding solutions.

Parties often want to resolve their differences in private, particularly if they are worried about the possibility of commercially sensitive or personal issues becoming public, as would happen if their dispute ended up in court. Mediation is especially attractive where there is desire to maintain continuing relationships, which could be damaged in adversarial forums such as arbitration or litigation.

But mediation may not always be suitable. There are certain situations where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll