header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 April 2016 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Do not pass go

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
001_nlj_7694_burns

Martin Burns considers the situations when mediation may be unsuitable

Mediation is a practical and sensible method for resolving an immense range of disputes. There is plenty of first-hand testimony to demonstrate the effectiveness of mediation, and it is increasingly being used in both commercial and consumer markets.

It is particularly useful where parties want to be in charge of the process and timetable, and retain control over the ultimate decision on their dispute. Mediation is nearly always the right way to go when parties believe their differences can be resolved through discussion, and they are willing to cooperate in finding solutions.

Parties often want to resolve their differences in private, particularly if they are worried about the possibility of commercially sensitive or personal issues becoming public, as would happen if their dispute ended up in court. Mediation is especially attractive where there is desire to maintain continuing relationships, which could be damaged in adversarial forums such as arbitration or litigation.

But mediation may not always be suitable. There are certain situations where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll