header-logo header-logo

17 July 2015 / Phillipa Bruce-Kerr
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Changing times

nlj_7661_bruce-kerr

Phillipa Bruce-Kerr explains how deprivation of liberty cases overlap with the private client arena

Many wills & probate lawyers would regard deprivation of liberty issues as being solely the concern of lawyers advising on human rights. In fact, the issues impact on many older and vulnerable people, their families and their carers. They are also generating considerable work for local authority legal teams and for the Court of Protection (CoP). The reasons for the high level of activity are twofold—chiefly the developing case law and, secondly, some poorly-considered legislation.

The underlying legal rights are those enshrined in Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the convention), which states: “Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law.” Clause 4 requires that “everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll