header-logo header-logo

Book review: Charged: How the police try to suppress protest

12 May 2023 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail
“The policing of protest has been conducted in a routinely violent way for more than four decades”
  • Authors: Matt Foot and Morag Livingstone
  • Publisher: Verso
  • ISBN: 9781839762499
  • RRP: £18.99


The government will always defend the right to protest,’ said Priti Patel to the virtual Conservative party conference in 2020. ‘That right is a fundamental pillar of our democracy, but the hooliganism and thuggery we have seen is not. It is indefensible.’ In other words, the previous home secretary would defend the right so long as it didn’t hold up the traffic or upset the law-abiding majority.

Her Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, described by Liberal Democrat peer and deputy assistant commissioner of the Met Police Brian Paddick as ‘draconian and anti-democratic’, is now on the statue books, enabling the police to impose start and finish times for protests, as well as maximum noise levels.

Policing by consent a myth?

Never has our supposedly cherished right to protest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll