header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Paul Davidoff
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Opinion , Charities , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Charity can begin at home

nlj_7739_davidoff

Will probate disputes decline in the light of Heather Ilott’s reversal of fortune, asks Paul Davidoff

Does the recent Supreme Court decision in Ilott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17 now mean that we cannot disinherit our adult children? The answer is now, as it was before: it depends. What we do have is more clarity on how the courts will approach a claim by a disappointed adult child.

In some European countries, children have an absolute right to a share of their parents’ estates. If a parent does not give them the minimum amount prescribed by law, the children have an automatic right to claim it. That is not the case in England and Wales. Here, we may leave our estates to whomever we wish, including charities—no one, not even our partner or children, has an absolute right to any of it.

Despite this freedom, Parliament has decreed that, in some circumstances, we ought to make provision for others and the most recent statutory rules are set out in the Inheritance (Provision for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll