header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Paul Davidoff
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Opinion , Charities , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Charity can begin at home

nlj_7739_davidoff

Will probate disputes decline in the light of Heather Ilott’s reversal of fortune, asks Paul Davidoff

Does the recent Supreme Court decision in Ilott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17 now mean that we cannot disinherit our adult children? The answer is now, as it was before: it depends. What we do have is more clarity on how the courts will approach a claim by a disappointed adult child.

In some European countries, children have an absolute right to a share of their parents’ estates. If a parent does not give them the minimum amount prescribed by law, the children have an automatic right to claim it. That is not the case in England and Wales. Here, we may leave our estates to whomever we wish, including charities—no one, not even our partner or children, has an absolute right to any of it.

Despite this freedom, Parliament has decreed that, in some circumstances, we ought to make provision for others and the most recent statutory rules are set out in the Inheritance (Provision for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll