header-logo header-logo

Charity can begin at home

24 March 2017 / Paul Davidoff
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Opinion , Charities , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7739_davidoff

Will probate disputes decline in the light of Heather Ilott’s reversal of fortune, asks Paul Davidoff

Does the recent Supreme Court decision in Ilott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17 now mean that we cannot disinherit our adult children? The answer is now, as it was before: it depends. What we do have is more clarity on how the courts will approach a claim by a disappointed adult child.

In some European countries, children have an absolute right to a share of their parents’ estates. If a parent does not give them the minimum amount prescribed by law, the children have an automatic right to claim it. That is not the case in England and Wales. Here, we may leave our estates to whomever we wish, including charities—no one, not even our partner or children, has an absolute right to any of it.

Despite this freedom, Parliament has decreed that, in some circumstances, we ought to make provision for others and the most recent statutory rules are set out in the Inheritance (Provision for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll