header-logo header-logo

Charles Russell Speechlys—Richard Ellis

07 February 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

The firm welcomes the financial services partner back to its London office

Charles Russell Speechlys has announced that Richard Ellis is rejoining the firm as a partner within its financial services regulation and funds practice.

Richard is a well-established financial services lawyer with a wide-ranging regulatory practice. Day to day he advises on the nature and scope of UK financial services regulation and regularly assists clients with the FCA authorisation process. His client base encompasses exchanges, multilateral and organised trading facilities, proprietary trading firms and investment managers.

Richard has a deep interest in the Fintech sector and has forged strong relationships with—as well as various instructions from—payment services firms, crowdfunding platforms and cryptoasset businesses. Having previously worked for a Lloyd’s of London insurer, Richard has a thorough understanding of how financial services law applies in practice. He regularly applies his practical learnings to his client work.

Richard said: ‘It is a pleasure to be returning to Charles Russell Speechlys. I am looking forward to working alongside the wider team to strengthen and develop the practice into new areas and market segments. The firm has a great culture and client base, and I am excited to be back.’

Richard will work closely with William Garner, partner and head of financial services regulation & funds, to forge and foster client relationships within the private capital sphere, as well as to support the wider cross-practice business objectives.

William said: ‘It is fantastic to welcome Richard back to the firm. He is a collegiate team player with extensive industry know-how and excellent client relationships. His expertise, gained from over ten years in private practice, and ‘on the ground’ in-house roles will enhance the division’s ability to meet the increasingly complex needs of our private capital clients and ever-changing regulatory environment.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll