header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 October 2023 / Fern Schofield , Edward Blakeney
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cheque-mate? Returning tenancy deposits by cheque

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
143307
Edward Blakeney & Fern Schofield on the pitfalls of returning deposits by cheque
  • Can a deposit ever be ‘returned’ for the purposes of s 215(2A) of the Housing Act 2004 by simple delivery to the tenant of a cheque for the full amount where the cheque has not been cashed?
  • The questions of fact and degree which can arise in the instance of return of sums by cheque have the potential to complicate many sets of proceedings.

In the not-too-distant past, the use of cheques was seen as outdated, and they were set to be scrapped. They received a reprieve and those plans were shelved, but they continued to be a relatively infrequently used form of payment.

However, cheques have recently been thrust (somewhat) back into the limelight with the County Court decision of HHJ Luba KC in Richworth Ltd v Billingham [2023] EW Misc 8 (CC), which looks at the surprisingly knotty problem of returning tenancy deposits by cheque and the surprisingly limited amount of authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll