header-logo header-logo

20 October 2023 / Fern Schofield , Edward Blakeney
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cheque-mate? Returning tenancy deposits by cheque

143307
Edward Blakeney & Fern Schofield on the pitfalls of returning deposits by cheque
  • Can a deposit ever be ‘returned’ for the purposes of s 215(2A) of the Housing Act 2004 by simple delivery to the tenant of a cheque for the full amount where the cheque has not been cashed?
  • The questions of fact and degree which can arise in the instance of return of sums by cheque have the potential to complicate many sets of proceedings.

In the not-too-distant past, the use of cheques was seen as outdated, and they were set to be scrapped. They received a reprieve and those plans were shelved, but they continued to be a relatively infrequently used form of payment.

However, cheques have recently been thrust (somewhat) back into the limelight with the County Court decision of HHJ Luba KC in Richworth Ltd v Billingham [2023] EW Misc 8 (CC), which looks at the surprisingly knotty problem of returning tenancy deposits by cheque and the surprisingly limited amount of authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll