header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 October 2023 / Fern Schofield , Edward Blakeney
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cheque-mate? Returning tenancy deposits by cheque

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
143307
Edward Blakeney & Fern Schofield on the pitfalls of returning deposits by cheque
  • Can a deposit ever be ‘returned’ for the purposes of s 215(2A) of the Housing Act 2004 by simple delivery to the tenant of a cheque for the full amount where the cheque has not been cashed?
  • The questions of fact and degree which can arise in the instance of return of sums by cheque have the potential to complicate many sets of proceedings.

In the not-too-distant past, the use of cheques was seen as outdated, and they were set to be scrapped. They received a reprieve and those plans were shelved, but they continued to be a relatively infrequently used form of payment.

However, cheques have recently been thrust (somewhat) back into the limelight with the County Court decision of HHJ Luba KC in Richworth Ltd v Billingham [2023] EW Misc 8 (CC), which looks at the surprisingly knotty problem of returning tenancy deposits by cheque and the surprisingly limited amount of authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll