header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 October 2023 / Fern Schofield , Edward Blakeney
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Cheque-mate? Returning tenancy deposits by cheque

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
143307
Edward Blakeney & Fern Schofield on the pitfalls of returning deposits by cheque
  • Can a deposit ever be ‘returned’ for the purposes of s 215(2A) of the Housing Act 2004 by simple delivery to the tenant of a cheque for the full amount where the cheque has not been cashed?
  • The questions of fact and degree which can arise in the instance of return of sums by cheque have the potential to complicate many sets of proceedings.

In the not-too-distant past, the use of cheques was seen as outdated, and they were set to be scrapped. They received a reprieve and those plans were shelved, but they continued to be a relatively infrequently used form of payment.

However, cheques have recently been thrust (somewhat) back into the limelight with the County Court decision of HHJ Luba KC in Richworth Ltd v Billingham [2023] EW Misc 8 (CC), which looks at the surprisingly knotty problem of returning tenancy deposits by cheque and the surprisingly limited amount of authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll