header-logo header-logo

20 April 2020 / Alexandra Baggallay
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail

Separated families, child arrangements & coronavirus

Alexandra Baggallay considers the law & options available for separated parents during COVID-19
  • Explains the law relating to Child Arrangement Orders during the pandemic.
  • Considers the law where parents agree on contact, and where they don’t.
  • Makes practical suggestions for separated parents during the outbreak.

COVID-19 poses huge challenges to all families, but particularly for separated parents working out how best to co-parent during a pandemic.

Many children whose parents are separated spend time with each parent, whether that is a few hours on weekends, or by dividing their time equally across two households. The old terms ‘contact’ and ‘residence’ have been replaced with ‘child arrangements’, and an order setting out which time the child is to spend with each parent is a ‘Child Arrangements Order’ (CAO). Many separated parents do not have a court order setting out the arrangements for their children, where they have been able to reach agreement on the arrangements without court assistance.

Can existing arrangements continue?

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll