header-logo header-logo

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Child cruelty sentences raised

Tougher sentences for child cruelty could be introduced, along with a higher culpability threshold for the most serious cases, under draft guidelines from the Sentencing Council

The increased penalties reflect new maximum sentences introduced by the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. Offenders would receive up to 18 years in prison for the offences of ‘causing or allowing a child to die or suffer serious physical harm’, and up to 12 years for ‘cruelty to a child’.

The 2022 Act raised the maximum penalty for ‘causing or allowing a child to die’ from 14 years to life imprisonment and the maximum for ‘physical harm and cruelty’ from ten years to 14 years.

A specific additional category of very high culpability’ would be added to the culpability table, reflecting the approach taken in manslaughter. It would be indicated by ‘the extreme character of one or more culpability B factors and/or a combination of culpability B factors’―culpability B (high culpability) includes ‘prolonged’ or multiple incidents’, ‘gratuitous degradation or sadistic behaviour’, ‘deliberate disregard for the victim’s welfare’, ‘use of a weapon’ or ‘very significant force’.

The Council states the reasons for the additional category are that it ‘considers that the revised maximum penalties were intended by Parliament to capture the worst cases of child cruelty, rather than as a means of increasing sentences imposed across the board.

‘For example, the Council is unaware of any suggestion that sentencing is too low in lower culpability cases where the offender has been coerced, has a mental disorder, took some steps to protect the child, or where the offence resulted from a brief lapse of judgement. More broadly, the Council has not been made aware of any particular concerns about the application of the current guidelines.’

The Council is seeking views on its consultation paper by 27 October. 

Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll