header-logo header-logo

Child law update

15 October 2010 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Dorothea Gartland reports on an unusual assessment

Practitioners may be aware of the decision Re A (Residential Assessment) [2009] EWHC 865 (Fam), [2009] 2 FLR 443 by Mr Justice Munby (as he then was). The case concerned care proceedings where the baby girl was accommodated by the local authority with foster carers a fortnight after her birth and was later made the subject of an interim care order.

The parents had agreed that threshold was met and accepted that they were not able to care for the child. The paternal great grandmother and paternal aunt were joined as parties to the proceedings and given leave to apply for special guardianship orders. Both the aunt and great grandmother were positively assessed in a viability assessment of them as carers for the child. By 8 December 2008 the local authority had filed a special guardianship report that supported them as special guardians for the child.

The case was listed for a hearing in the family proceedings court on 16 December 2008. At that stage the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll