header-logo header-logo

15 October 2010 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Child law update

Dorothea Gartland reports on an unusual assessment

Practitioners may be aware of the decision Re A (Residential Assessment) [2009] EWHC 865 (Fam), [2009] 2 FLR 443 by Mr Justice Munby (as he then was). The case concerned care proceedings where the baby girl was accommodated by the local authority with foster carers a fortnight after her birth and was later made the subject of an interim care order.

The parents had agreed that threshold was met and accepted that they were not able to care for the child. The paternal great grandmother and paternal aunt were joined as parties to the proceedings and given leave to apply for special guardianship orders. Both the aunt and great grandmother were positively assessed in a viability assessment of them as carers for the child. By 8 December 2008 the local authority had filed a special guardianship report that supported them as special guardians for the child.

The case was listed for a hearing in the family proceedings court on 16 December 2008. At that stage the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll