header-logo header-logo

Child’s play?

04 October 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
heaton

Ed Heaton reviews the current child support system & outlines developments over the last 12 months

In December 2012, a number of amendments made to the child support system by the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (CMOPA 2008) were brought into force in relation to new applications for child support, involving four or more children. In July of this year, the amendments were rolled out in respect of new applications relating to two or three children. It is clearly just a matter of time before they will be applied also to applications relating to a single child.

But what do the amendments mean in practice? Well, CMOPA 2008 amends the statutory scheme relating to the calculation, collection and enforcement of child support. It effectively introduces a third scheme, its predecessors having been introduced by the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991) and the subsequent Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Act 2000 (which amended CSA 1991).

This article will highlight some of the latest changes under the third scheme and seek to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll