header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Child support reforms: third time lucky?

The controversial Child Support Agency (CSA) is to be replaced by C-MEC, a body with greatly enhanced powers to force non-resident parents to pay child maintenance.

C-MEC, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, will be able to: blacklist defaulting parents from taking out loans and mortgages; take money out of bank accounts; impose curfews; and force parents to surrender their passports. It will have powers to charge errant parents for the cost of tracking them down.

The reforms, outlined in the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill, is an attempt to curb the failures of the CSA, which has an overall debt mountain of £3.5bn including about £760m from debts so long-standing they can no longer be legally enforced.

However, family lawyers are campaigning to amend the proposed reforms. Resolution’s child support committee chair Kim Fellowes, a director at Newcastle firm Dickinson Dees LLP, says Resolution is concerned that, while the government is keen to reduce administrative burdens by encouraging parents to agree their own private arrangements, the proposed reforms contain nothing that would enable parents to enforce these arrangements.

She says it is unclear where parents could go to get help on working out arrangements.

The group points out that there is no information on how historic debt, which can no longer be legally enforced, will be collected and if compensation will be paid to those parents who have lost these maintenance payments through no fault of their own.

Resolution also wants divorce courts to be given the power to cover arrangements for child support payments where they are already involved.
Fellowes adds: “Two versions of the CSA have failed thousands of children and their parents to date and the government’s latest plans look set to continue that trend.”

Issue: 7277 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll