header-logo header-logo

26 March 2020
Issue: 7880 / Categories: Features , Family , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Children arbitration expands to cover relocations

18320
Suzanne Kingston & Janet Bazley explain the practicalities of the expansion of the children arbitration scheme.
  • The children scheme, run by the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA), has been in operation since 2016.
  • It is being extended to include both temporary and permanent relocation to certain foreign jurisdictions.

Family arbitration has come a long way since the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA) launched its financial arbitration scheme in 2012. There has been a steady growth in financial arbitration, and it is now increasingly preferred over the court process for the resolution of many financial disputes. Parties appreciate the benefits of a bespoke process and the confidentially it affords. Huge delays in the court process have also had an impact on take-up.

In 2016, the children scheme was launched. For safeguarding reasons, external leave to remove applications were excluded. Nearly four years later, the scheme is established, successful, supported by family judges and recognised as providing the same advantages of the financial scheme in terms of speed, judicial continuity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll