header-logo header-logo

Children arbitration expands to cover relocations

26 March 2020
Issue: 7880 / Categories: Features , Family , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
18320
Suzanne Kingston & Janet Bazley explain the practicalities of the expansion of the children arbitration scheme.
  • The children scheme, run by the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA), has been in operation since 2016.
  • It is being extended to include both temporary and permanent relocation to certain foreign jurisdictions.

Family arbitration has come a long way since the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA) launched its financial arbitration scheme in 2012. There has been a steady growth in financial arbitration, and it is now increasingly preferred over the court process for the resolution of many financial disputes. Parties appreciate the benefits of a bespoke process and the confidentially it affords. Huge delays in the court process have also had an impact on take-up.

In 2016, the children scheme was launched. For safeguarding reasons, external leave to remove applications were excluded. Nearly four years later, the scheme is established, successful, supported by family judges and recognised as providing the same advantages of the financial scheme in terms of speed, judicial continuity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll