header-logo header-logo

17 August 2017
Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Children deserve privacy rights too

 

The rise of ‘sharenting’, YouTube families and ‘science entertainment’ television programmes adversely affects the privacy of children, according to a new report.

The University of Winchester report, Have ‘Generation Tagged’ lost their privacy?, calls for young children to have an independent right to privacy, separate from whatever their parents think about their own privacy. It urges social media and internet companies to consider young children’s privacy and best interests in their operations.

The report recommends that there be a limit to the re-contextualising of images and information about young children, enforced by new image matching and tracking technologies. A further recommendation is the introduction of a Children’s Digital Ombudsman who could provide a way for children’s interests to be better represented in respect of all forms of digital publication. 

‘As a society, we’re exposing ever younger children more and more in broadcast media and on the internet, by filming them for “science entertainment” programmes and by “sharenting” on social media sites,’ said Marion Oswald, one of the report’s authors.

‘Young people may therefore grow up in a world which already knows a lot about them that they have not chosen to share. A child may grow to regret their exposure in the media. We shouldn’t put all our eggs in the basket of the so-called “right to be forgotten”. By the time a child is older, it may be too late.’

The government recently announced a new Data Protection Bill that will give people the right to force social media companies to delete their personal data (the right to be forgotten).

Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll