header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Children in divorce

The statement of arrangements for children in matrimonial proceedings, and the requirement for the court to give a certificate of satisfaction or otherwise, in relation to those arrangements, have now been scrapped. I also see that the petition guidance notes state that details of the children no longer have to be pleaded and that any details given are only for statistical purposes. Does this mean that the court has absolutely no interest at decree nisi stage in what is happening to the children, no matter how concerned it may be about certain material apparent to it? Further, what happens if there is a dispute about whether or not a child is a child of the family and there is to be a financial remedy application in which this could be relevant? Does the issue have to be determined as part of the financial remedy application?

The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 no longer contain any provision requiring the court, when certifying or making a decree nisi, to consider whether its powers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll