header-logo header-logo

Children in divorce

02 October 2014
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

The statement of arrangements for children in matrimonial proceedings, and the requirement for the court to give a certificate of satisfaction or otherwise, in relation to those arrangements, have now been scrapped. I also see that the petition guidance notes state that details of the children no longer have to be pleaded and that any details given are only for statistical purposes. Does this mean that the court has absolutely no interest at decree nisi stage in what is happening to the children, no matter how concerned it may be about certain material apparent to it? Further, what happens if there is a dispute about whether or not a child is a child of the family and there is to be a financial remedy application in which this could be relevant? Does the issue have to be determined as part of the financial remedy application?

The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 no longer contain any provision requiring the court, when certifying or making a decree nisi, to consider whether its powers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll