header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Children in divorce

The statement of arrangements for children in matrimonial proceedings, and the requirement for the court to give a certificate of satisfaction or otherwise, in relation to those arrangements, have now been scrapped. I also see that the petition guidance notes state that details of the children no longer have to be pleaded and that any details given are only for statistical purposes. Does this mean that the court has absolutely no interest at decree nisi stage in what is happening to the children, no matter how concerned it may be about certain material apparent to it? Further, what happens if there is a dispute about whether or not a child is a child of the family and there is to be a financial remedy application in which this could be relevant? Does the issue have to be determined as part of the financial remedy application?

The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 no longer contain any provision requiring the court, when certifying or making a decree nisi, to consider whether its powers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll